home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing?
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing (1998)(Marshall Media)[Mac-PC].iso
/
mac
/
ILLUSION
/
SROCK_TX.CXT
/
00158_Text_rel05t.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-12-31
|
2KB
|
57 lines
The dents in the side of this
battleship create an effect
based on our perception of their
shadows.
The ubiquity and importance
of shadow in depth perception
can be gathered by simply
looking around a room in
which you are sitting or by
considering the effect of shade
and shadow in photographs and
paintings. There is a curious
ambiguity about the meaning of
shading, however. A depression
and an elevation in a surface
will both be shaded on one side,
since the light comes
predominantly from a
particular direction. How,
then, can we tell the
difference? If we are aware of
the direction from which the
illumination comes, we could,
in principle, infer whether the
region was elevated (e.g., a
mound, bump, or bas relief) or
depressed (e.g., a concave
hollow, hole, or intaglio). If it
were a mound, the shading
would be on the side opposite to
the source of light, whereas if
it were a hollow, the shading
would be on the same side.
But what do we perceive
when we do not know the
direction of the source of light,
as often we do not, particularly
when viewing pictures?
Although the stimulus is
ambiguous, we tend to perceive
a region immediately as
elevated or depressed. In one
photograph shown here,
we tend to see raised regions or
"bumps," whereas in the
other one, we tend to see
indentations or "holes," even
though it is simply the first one
turned upside down.
Apparently, the perceptual
system, in the absence of
contradictory information,
makes the assumption that the
light is coming from above.